|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
701
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 23:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
What makes this LOL is that no one "joins" the CODE/New Order in ganking things. There's no top secret meeting, no special handshake, no decoder ring. You learn to fly some gank ships, get a kill board that shows you know how high-sec gank mechanics work. That's it. Anyone is welcome to fleet with us. We often have members from every major null sec alliance in our fleets.
Everyone can put politics and wars aside when it comes to the common goal of blowing up shiny things that are idiot fit and probably on auto :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
701
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 23:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:For some people, shooting at ships with no guns is the riskiest thing they will ever do.
Lets not belittle their achievements.
We don't discriminate, unlike most EVE players. I know of members of my alliance who have never engaged in any type of PVP beyond high sec ganking (this is very rare), whereas most of us tend to be alts of characters who simply want a break from grinding sov or other activities.
*edit: corrected a typo* |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
701
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 05:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Ihubs dont have guns, freighters dont have guns. I think i get it now :)
Thanks for the clarification.
Yes, take a fast look at the CODE. alliance killboard and you'll clearly see we never shoot anyone that shoots back. Except when we do. Which is often.
We also never kill anything in low sec, nullsec, or wormhole space. Except when we do.
My advice to everyone is to create support tickets, for some weird reason CCP keeps showing all of our kills as "real" and "valid" kills even though we all know none of them actually count, right? Something must be bugged. :P
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
702
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 09:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:DJentropy Ovaert wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Ihubs dont have guns, freighters dont have guns. I think i get it now :)
Thanks for the clarification.
Yes, take a fast look at the CODE. alliance killboard and you'll clearly see we never shoot anyone that shoots back. Except when we do. Which is often. We also never kill anything in low sec, nullsec, or wormhole space. Except when we do. My advice to everyone is to create support tickets, for some weird reason CCP keeps showing all of our kills as "real" and "valid" kills even though we all know none of them actually count, right? Something must be bugged. :P CODE. in july killed 4,407 ships; - 4,118 high sec ganks. - 281 kills in pyne with an insta-lock camp that runs away from anything that might fight back. - 0 null sec kills.
So, let's recap:
You say:
"For some people, shooting at ships with no guns is the riskiest thing they will ever do."
I provide evidence of nearly 300 ships this month with guns killed by my alliance.
You ignore that, as we scored those kills in ways you feel don't have enough e-bushido. rofl :) Just admit you were totally wrong, HTFU, move on.
lol as usual - I provide evidence of nearly 300 kills against ships that were armed and took place outside of high sec, and of course they don't count. We had superior numbers and better locking speed. We got some of them at a low sec gate-camp. We did not bow three times as proper fleet bushido mandates. We had better guns. The list goes on and on :) This is classic and happens every single time someone claims "CODE does not ever shoot anyone who shoots back!" (which, by the way, you totally claimed!) and then when provided with evidence that totally disproves your statement, you come up with a reason why that does not count. We blobbed. Our lock time was too fast. We had more ships. We had better team-work. It was not a "fair" fight.
Of course, those on the other side of the fight who manage to do 1% damage against a catalyst in high-sec while concord does the other 99% is a honorable warrior who scored a "real" kill and should be praised, right? :) Such lulz. We get this every single day. The tears fill our jars and we laugh about it, all day, every day, while we continue to win.
As to you not seeing any nullsec kills, you need to look harder. We don't often roam null - but there's some kills here and there. Also, why should we? We can roam and kill anywhere we want, and every single kill we make counts according to the game. CCP supports them, they are kills, they are PVP, the killboards list them, the ingame kill log lists them - this sounds like a problem you need to take up with CCP. Give them your list of what makes a kill "real" or "count" and ask them to modify the game to only include those kills. So by your standards, only null-sec kills that do NOT take place at a gate where the attackers are smart enough to bring fast tackle should count? Get that support ticket going, dude.
Again, you should really create a support ticket. It's funny, our kills seem to still keep counting, and around 100 of us seem to keep outperforming most massive null-sec alliances in terms of number of kills - and it all seems to still count! There must be some kind of bug :P |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
702
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 09:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:
In short: CODE are the biggest cowards eve has ever seen excepting goons
Grrrr goons Grrrr code
eve is so unfair :( you should rage at the dudes in your own alliance who fly with the CODE all the time, must suck to have such cowards in your alliance.
lol nulli |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:DJentropy Ovaert wrote:Good stuff. What i actually wrote was the stats were better than i thought and you guys are actually awesome. It would seem you doubt my sincerity? I wonder why that is?
Nice edit :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote: So you're saying 13% of your kills were valid PvP fights, and not ganks? That metric still doesn't look good from a mathematical viewpoint.
No, 100% of our kills were valid PvP fights. There was a player, and another player or group of players engaged them in combat, thus: player vs. player.
My point was a response to an earlier comment, where the tired rhetoric of "CODE never shoots at anything that can shoot back" was thrown out there (except when we do, which appears to have been %13 of the time over whatever time period was sampled there. Thirteen percent > zero percent. |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Major Trant wrote:Personally I don't see any issues with ganking freighters, haulers, miners, even shuttles and noob ships. In null or low sec it is a no brainer assuming the target is not blue to the ganker. A certain level of skill and/or luck is required on the part of the ganker to find and kill the target, coupled with the decision on the part of the target to place his vessel in the hostile environment in the first place. In high sec it can be justified, when the benefit outweighs the expected losses. I'm thinking an operation where a freighter is scanned to find a valuable cargo and then a suicide gank is carried out with a hauler being brought in to scoop the loot and the expected haul to more than cover the cost of the lost suicided ships. I take my hat off to people that manage this. I've even done it a couple of times. The fact that I don't do it more is because it isn't as easy as it sounds. Requires patience and a sec status which I just can't be bothered to maintain or pay for. That's assuming that the purpose of said gank, has a 'real' objective. I say this because there is no skill on the part of the ganker, or luck involved, or bad play on the part of the target. And there is the rub that I think most people have with Code and other parties that do what they do. What is their objective? Looking at Code's Killboard, it clearly isn't profit. It appears to be Killboard padding. Now in my opinion killboard padding is a valid objective. However, if you are going for killboard padding, you have to be honest. It seems these people are exploiting the fact that their losses to Concord are not pulled to the killboard, so they are getting these great killboard stats and isk efficiencies while just pretending that they didn't lose anything and we haven't even got onto the very real and significant additional cost of buying back your sec status. In short they are trading Isk via a flawed mechanic for killmails so that they can pretend to be leet PvPers. They will of course say, it is about the tears etc, but I think this bitter comment was very telling. DJentropy Ovaert wrote:Of course, those on the other side of the fight who manage to do 1% damage against a catalyst in high-sec while concord does the other 99% is a honorable warrior who scored a "real" kill and should be praised, right? It is clear that the real sting for the author here is that the 1% damage from another player, resulted in the killmail getting pulled by the killboards. Guys, if it is killboard padding you want and you can't be honest about it. A more efficient method would be to just post fake mails. But I guess the popular independent killboards take measures to stop that sort of thing. It's just not fair is it?
Ummm, no :)
Well thought out post, and thanks for it - but you're missing some of the point.
We don't gank for profit - there's no need for it. Every single ship we use is 100% free and paid for by fans of the New Order / our blog. Personally I don't gank for "tears" (though I know some people who do!) - I gank for fun. I find hunting down targets and exploding them to be a ton of fun. There's no point in "killboard padding" - a lulzy killboard comes naturally when you fly with CODE, but anyone with any experience can see the difference between a CODE agent's killboard and a more "traditional" type of PVP player's killboard. I take losses all the time, does not bother me at all.
As to your final comment about the 1% damage someone might do on a gank ship and as a result killboards pulling that - zkillboard pulls everything. It does not matter if CONCORD/FacPol did 100% of the damage or a player did 100% of the damage. It's still a loss, and it still counts. We are totally fine with that :) Check this out:
http://puu.sh/aK5Dg/7df357bb54.jpg
As you can see, all of my losses are there. And those losses were 100% CONCORD/FacPol kills.
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
I would just like to clarify, that was over june and july, there were no low sec kills in june so the actual percentage over that sample was closer to 6%.
CONGRATULATIONS!!
I would just like to clarify that you claimed 0% and still have not admitted you were totally wrong :P
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
On a related note: When you are browsing our kill boards if you take a look at "losses" you will notice we get shot down by other players from time to time and take losses of our own. The reason people don't know about this is that unlike high-sec miners, we don't create 60 page threadnaughts begging CCP to nerf guns in high-sec, unlike the average high security miner :) |
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
708
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 17:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:DJentropy Ovaert wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:
I would just like to clarify, that was over june and july, there were no low sec kills in june so the actual percentage over that sample was closer to 6%.
CONGRATULATIONS!!
I would just like to clarify that you claimed 0% and still have not admitted you were totally wrong :P That is exactly why im congratulating you.
Fair enough :) L33t pvp, eh mate? It's just a well known fact: the CODE always wins :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
748
|
Posted - 2014.08.14 10:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Zen Guerrilla wrote:Wow.
Gotta give DJentropy Ovaert some credit for trying so damn hard to convince everyone what CODE does is proper pvp.
lol @ "Proper" PVP. I'm digging through the game client right now as well as all the popular killboards and not seeing a seperate section for "proper" and "improper" PVP.
Could it be that you are playing by rules that the game client itself has no understanding of? :)
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
748
|
Posted - 2014.08.14 10:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:Thanks ISD Atomic Dove
DJ Ovary Wrote - Everyone can put politics and wars aside when it comes to the common goal of blowing up shiny things that are idiot fit and probably on auto :)
An idiot fit?
They are piloting Orca's and Freighters. Not much fit to them. Unlike the Blob that shows up and attacks them.
The real question that cannot be misdirected is why doesn't CODE go into Low and Null Sector and preform the same actions?
The reason being is that the ships and pilots in low and null have teeth and bite back unlike CODE that beats around freighters and orca's like they are little old women and men in wheel chairs that can't fight back.
Last time I checked, Dryson, you were not a respected member of the New Order - this means you don't get to deploy our fleets. I know you think we should "go to Low and Null Sector" - but we generally don't allow random people to determine where we go or what we do. I'm sure you understand :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
748
|
Posted - 2014.08.14 10:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:What a shame it will be for the Amarr Faction War when the Minmatar show up at one your sector POS bashing's or when the Minmatar show up in Aufay to bash CODE around.
The Amarr Militia are a joke in the faction war and they know they are. Just like everyone knows that CODE and James315 is also a joke. A joke that will persist forever for the Amarr Militia but will wax and wane into nothingness for CODE.
Trying to send a message to "the Minmatar" to remind them to show up in Aufay to fight us, but for some reason it's not working.
Perhaps you should gather "the Minmatar" forces, FC them, deploy your unstoppable "scissors technique" and do something beyond smacktalking in local or creating threads that make little to no sense, Dryson. |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
748
|
Posted - 2014.08.14 10:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:
Only reason CODE killboards look good is because losses to CONCORD are not counted.
Fact is, if more people whored on the CONCORD kills against CODE, those killboards would look like shite.
Where are you getting this from?!?!
Head over to http://zkillboard.com - in the little search box, search for me. Click "losses". You'll notice that every single loss I take is "counted", including losses to CONCORD. Literally 99% of my losses are due to CONCORD, and they are all right there. Why do people keep repeating this rumor like it has any basis in reality? |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
776
|
Posted - 2014.08.17 13:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Well, guys - we went ahead and took you up on your challenge. After all, everyone knows that if members of the New Order dare to leave high-sec and head out to low-sec for some PVP against targets who "can shoot back" - we are just going to end up getting smashed by the locals and laughed out of the area, right? I mean, none of us are any good at "real PVP" and are just a bunch of clueless players who have no idea what they are doing, right?
https://zkillboard.com/related/30045353/201408150500/
After a few moments of looking things over, we decided to set out on a mission to ensure that the Gallente and Caldari militia were showing support for the New Order. When we got there, however, we were shocked to find that not a single resident had a permit or a show of support for James 315 in their bio! We had no choice but to enforce the law.
After nearly three billion in damage done without a single ISK in loss to the New Order (Excluding ammo and repair paste, of course) - we decided to listen to the the locals and "Go back to high-sec". Funny how that works :)
Targets included members of:
Brave Privateers Caldari Armed Forces. Caldari Provisions Dayman Industries Exodus. Ideal Society Mecha Enterprises Fleet Native Freshfood Northern Coalition. Ordo Mortis Point Blank Alliance Repeat 0ffenders Sucker Punch Reloaded Texas Stretch Inc. The Bastard Cartel The Bastion Theory of Mind V01-D
Of course, we understand the care bear opinion that none of these kills are "real" or "count" due to *insert reason*. From all the involved New Order agents, we look forward to hearing your reasons why nothing we do "counts" or is "real" - even though all of the in-game tools and out-of-game killboards still seem to show our results.
Have a great weekend!
*From the diplomatic desk of the New Order of High-Sec* |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
821
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 10:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ahhh!
I see the confusion. Thanks for the link, I had no idea eve-kill behaved like this!
eve-kill.net actually pulls all of it's data from Zkill, but for some reason totally omits losses due to NPC's, Concord, Factional Police, Customs Police, etc...
Highly recommend you just consult Zkill at all times, nothing *against* Eve-Kill (in fact, I really like their layout) but the delay on updates is longer and the decision to make a bunch of kills not show in the first place makes it a little less useful.
Here, look at my losses:
https://zkillboard.com/character/94096400/losses/
Every single loss, regardless of if some player did damage along with CONCORD, or if 100% of the damage was CONCORD.
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
821
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 10:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:
I know that fleet setup. The insta-locking gate camp setup. Scouts in adjacent systems, ships are fitted with rails or arty, sitting off gate at optimal ranges, if anything big shows up, or opposing fleet; ya'll warp off to one of loyalanon's safes. Yeah, DJ, real pro.
Confirming that bringing a well fit fleet to a target rich environment, making sure that the fleet has the needed tackle to engage the enemy successfully, fitting with rail guns or artillery, making sure to be at an effective range for weapons to be useful, using scouts, and making the decision to withdraw if an overwhelming force decides to engage is not a good idea and that you will never win any fights like this. None of the well ranked killers and effective PVP players in EVE use any of these strategies.
Everyone knows that the PROS never use a scout, only use missles or lasers, are always at the wrong range for their weapons to apply DPS effectively , lack proper tackle to hold their enemy and continue to engage targets in a situation where victory is no longer a possibility. After all, this is the one and only true path to e-Bushido and Cyber-Honor. |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
824
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 10:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Not that hard when they just softball them in like that :P
It's literally like punching babies in the face, pretty much the same thing.
* Notice: The CODE. Alliance does not condone or encourage any type of baby punching, and recent accusations of baby-punching that have been claimed at http://minerbumping.com are a very serious issue that we are currently laughing about, errr, investigating with probably levels of seriousness. |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
838
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 19:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:DJentropy Ovaert wrote:Not that hard when they just softball them in like that :P It's literally like punching babies in the face, pretty much the same thing. * Notice: The CODE. Alliance does not condone or encourage any type of baby punching, and recent accusations of baby-punching that have been claimed at http://minerbumping.com are a very serious issue that we are currently laughing about, errr, investigating with probably levels of seriousness. I'm so glad about this .... ......... I'm pregnant. It's yours ....... Wished I could see your face now.... XD
That's it, I'm quitting EVE and joining WOW to be a deadbeat dad. Thanks, Solecist.
|
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
896
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 23:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
Voyager Arran wrote:I can't tell you how disappointed I am that a gatecamp was running for that long without a goon managing to die to it. At least you got a Bastion member, that's almost kinda the same thing.
Glad that had not happened, after all, the "anti-ganking" community would apply their flawless logic to it and realize that since the entire New Order consists of Goon alts, they were seeing evidence of some sort of epic internal power struggle or something like that. :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
938
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 00:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Varrinox wrote:Look at the ganking scrubs, bein all scrubby in scrubsec.
Right now that my post is at the level of posting of the rest of you I shall be real.
Firstly, nobody really cares and this does not warrant a thread.
Secondly, you talk like code ar the first group who did organised ganking. Son, you are far from the first and for sure wont be the last because you will no doubt get bored of such uneventful pvp and some other slack jawed fool will take your place.
Lastly, biohazard were in amarr militia for a while. Gallente before that and started of in minmatar. Don't take their movement as any kind of reflection on amarr militias real attitude to caldari. Caldari gallente minmatar, your all scum to us, jut that 2 of you show up orange and the other shows up purple. Also from my understanding biohazard is where it is because the then CEO aslon wanted to move to Nullsec, most of his pilots didnt want to go, alliance disbanded, CEO left, majority of leadership has left. All you have is the leftovers of a failed minmatar talwar blob corp.
And on the topic on amarr vs caldari, if you got the likes of 24eme or DnG to attack caldari, then you can call it real war between us.
Until that point you can continue to faceroll in highsec
In conclusion. **** you.
rofl someone is angry and I fear he have may have immersed himself a little too much
but I give you a +10 internets for one of the most random angry rage posts I have read all day. Bonus points for
"Firstly, nobody really cares and this does not warrant a thread."
You seem to care, sir, you care a lot. Also you assume we care about your silly little FW thing. We just shoot you all :)
|

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
946
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 10:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Interesting dev blog about systems with high gank rates having their security status upped to make it harder to gank!
Might be interesting.
?
Link? I can't see that really working very well without the opposite happening, as in - if high-gank rate systems go up in sec status, then at some point everything will become 1.0 - which I am sure there are some carebears out there who would enjoy this, I don't see it working well for EVE.
Considering the flip side, we'd have to have systems that don't see much gank action drop in sec status. This means that 1.0 systems (think Jita) are going to drop fast and become slaughterhouses. Not that I would have a problem with this, but just imagine the tears :P |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
946
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 10:55:00 -
[24] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Nah sec only drops in systems that once had lower sec. Current sec is baseline.
Interesting.
I'm not against the idea right off the top of my head, but like all "large" changes - I worry there may be a lot of unintended side effects. I'd like to see it go a little deeper, however.
I think the logic here is that a bunch of ganking activity in one high-sec system should cause CONCORD to have a faster response time (by raising the sec status of that system), right? So, let's use that logic and assume that CONCORD has to come from somewhere, so systems with little or no ganking activity should be able to drop below baseline. This could be fun :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
947
|
Posted - 2014.09.04 11:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Varrinox wrote:You dont care about our little FW?
I dont care about your pressing F1 against AFK autopiloting ships.
As for the apparent rage, nah bro this is just good internet smack talk. I have a degree in it from Infantry Online.
Scrub lords of scrubsec remain scrubby
\o/ yay we can unite in lack of caring :) |

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite CODE.
1000
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 10:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Confirming that this forum needs more Drysonbenningon, ASAP. |
|
|
|